Articles

AC article references

 

2016

  • Dewberry, C., & Jackson, D. J. R. (2009). The Perceived Nature and Incidence of Dysfunctional Assessment Center Features and Processes, 24(2).
  • Gorman, C. A., & Rentsch, J. R. (2016). Retention of Assessment Center Rater Training. Http://Doi.Org/10.1027/1866-5888/A000167
  • Ingold, P. I. A. V, & Kleinmann, M. (2016). Transparency of Assessment Centers: Lower Criterion-Related Validity But Greater Opportunity to Perform?, 467–497. Http://Doi.Org/10.1111/Peps.12105
  • Jackson, D. J. R., Michaelides, G., Dewberry, C., & Kim, Y. (2016). Everything That You Have Ever Been Told About Assessment Center Ratings Is Confounded, 101(7), 976–994.
  • Merkulova, N., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., & Annen, H. (2016). A Test of the Generalizability of a Recently Suggested Conceptual Model for Assessment Center Ratings. Human Performance, 29(3), 226–250. Http://Doi.Org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1160093
  • Turner, A., Education, H., National, E., Service, H., & Nichol, L. (2016). Development Assessment Centres: Practice Implications Arising from Exploring the Participant Voice, 1(1), 85–99.
  • Wind, A., Rajan, A., & Harten, W. H. Van. (2016). Quality Assessments for Cancer Centers in the European Union, 1–9. Http://Doi.Org/10.1186/S12913-016-1738-2

 

2015

  • Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., Ladd, R. T., & Blair, C. A. (2016). Assessment Centers Vs Situational Judgment Tests: Longitudinal Predictors of Success. Http://Doi.Org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2014-0235
  • Furnham, A., & Toh, S. M. (2014). The Validation of an Assessment Centre in Asia, (1984). Http://Doi.Org/10.1108/APJBA-08-2013-0082
  • Hoffman, B. J., Kennedy, C. L., LoPilato, A. C., Monahan, E. L., & Lance, C. E. (2015). A Review of the Content, Criterion-Related, and Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Exercises. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1143–1168. doi: 10.1037/a0038707
  • Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., & Keen, G. (2015). The Interplay of Elicitation and Evaluation of Trait-Expressive Behavior: Evidence in Assessment Center Exercises, 100(4), 1169–1188.
  • Resource, H., & International, D. (2015). Assessing Global Leadership Competencies: The Critical Role of Assessment Centre Methodology, (August). Http://Doi.Org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1072125
  • The validation of an assessment centre in Asia. (2015). Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 7(1), 20. doi:10.1108/APJBA-08-2013-0082

2014

  • Benit, N., Mojzisch, A., & Soellner, R. (2014). Preselection methods prior to the internal assessment center for personnel selection in German companies. International Journal of Selection And Assessment, 22(3), 253-260. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12074
  • Burgess, A., Roberts, C., Mossman, K., & Clark, T., (2014). The social validity of a national assessment centre for selection into general practice training. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), doi:10.1186/s12909-014-0261-6
  • Falk, A., & Fox, S. (2014). Gender and ethnic composition of assessment centers and its relationship to participants’ success. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(1), 11-20. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000100
  • Fluckinger, C. D., Dudley, N. M., & Seeds, M. (2014). Incremental validity of interactive multimedia simulations in two organizations. International Journal Of Selection And Assessment, 22(1), 108-112. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12061
  • Hughes, J., Jose, D., Tuch, G., Fritschi, L., Wylie, E., & Tresham, J., (2014). Is step down assessment of screen-detected lesions as safe as workup at a metropolitan assessment centre?. Australian and New Zealand Journal Of Public Health, 38(1), 44-48. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12129
  • Klehe, U., Kleinmann, M., Nieß, C., & Grazi, J. (2014). Impression Management Behavior in Assessment Centers: Artificial Behavior or Much Ado About Nothing?. Human Performance, 27(1), 1-24. doi:10.1080/08959285.2013.85436542
  • Krause, D. E., Anderson, N., Rossberger, R. J., & Parastuty, Z. (2014). Assessment center practices in Indonesia: An exploratory study. International Journal Of Selection And Assessment, 22(4), 384-398. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12085
  • Kuncel, N. R., & Sackett, P. R. (2014). Resolving the assessment center construct validity problem (as we know it). Journal Of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 38-47. doi:10.1037/a0034147
  • Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., & Keen, G. (2014). The Interplay of Elicitation and Evaluation of Trait-Expressive Behavior: Evidence in Assessment Center Exercises. Journal Of Applied Psychology, doi:10.1037/apl0000004
  • Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). A Conceptual and Empirical Review of the Structure of Assessment Center Dimensions. Journal Of Management, 40(5), 1269-1296. doi:10.1177/0149206314522299
  • Merkulova, N., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Annen, H., & Tresch, T. S. (2014). Effects of individual differences on applicant perceptions of an operational assessment center. International Journal Of Selection And Assessment, 22(4), 355-370. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12083
  • Oliver, T., Hausdorf, P., Lievens, F., & Conlon, P. (2014). Interpersonal dynamics in assessment center exercises: Effects of role player portrayed disposition. Journal Of Management, doi:10.1177/0149206314525207
  • Roberts, C., Clark, T., Burgess, A., Frommer, M., Mossman, K., & Grant, M. (2014). The validity of a behavioural multiple-mini-interview within an assessment centre for selection into specialty training. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-169
  • Rotthoff, T., Ostapczuk, M. S., Kröncke, K. D., Zimmerhofer, A., Decking, U., Schneider, M., & Ritz-Timme, S. (2014). Criterion validity of a competency-based assessment center in medical education–a 4-year follow-up study. Medical Education Online, 1925254. doi:10.3402/meo.v19.25254
  • Speer, A. B., Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., & Golf, M. (2014). Situational Bandwidth and the Criterion-Related Validity of Assessment Center Ratings: Is Cross-Exercise Convergence Always Desirable?. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 282-295. doi:10.1037/a0035213
  • Speer, A. B., Christiansen, N. D., Melchers, K. G., König, C. J., & Kleinmann, M. (2014). Establishing the cross-situational convergence of the ability to identify criteria: Consistency and prediction across similar and dissimilar assessment center exercises. Human Performance, 27(1), 44-60. doi:10.1080/08959285.2013.854364
  • Whetzel, D., Rotenberry, P., & McDaniel, M. (2014). In-basket Validity: A systematic review. International Journal Of Selection And Assessment, 22(1), 62-79.
  • Wirz, A., Melchers, K. G., Schultheiss, S., & Kleinmann, M. (2014). Are improvements in assessment center construct-related validity paralleled by improvements in criterion-related validity? The effects of exercise similarity on assessment center validity. Journal Of Personnel Psychology, 13(4), 184-193. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000115
2010 - 2013
2013
  • Els, B., & Jorgensen, L. I. (2013). Efficacy evaluation of a leadership development assessment centre for managers. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(1),  113-118.
  • Gier, J. (2013). The Psychology of Assessment Centers. Personnel Psychology, 66 (4),  1059-1062. doi: 10.1111/peps.12058_3
  • Guenole, N., Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Guenole, N. (2013). More than a mirage: A large-scale assessment centre with more dimension variance than exercise variance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1),  5-21. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02063.x
  • Jansen, A., Lievens, F., König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Brändli, M., & Fraefel, L .(2013). Situation Assessment as an Ignored Factor in the Behavioral Consistency Paradigm Underlying the Validity of Personnel Selection Procedures.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 (2),  326-341. doi: 10.1037/a0031257
  • Jorgensen, L. I., & Els, B. (2013). Efficacy evaluation of a leadership development assessment centre for managers. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(1), 113-118.
  • Lee, J., “Measurement Invariance of Assessment Center Ratings: Consistency of Dimensional Constructs across Exercises” (2013). Master’s Theses. Paper 377. 
http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/377
  • Monahan, E. L., Hoffman, B. J., Lance, C. E., Jackson, D. J. R., & Foster, M. R. (2013). Now You See Them, Now You Do Not: The Influence of Indicator-Factor Ratio on Support for Assessment Center Dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 66 (4),  1009-1047. doi: 10.1111/peps.12049
  • Putka, D. J., & Hoffman, B. J. (2013). Clarifying the Contribution of Assessee-, Dimension-, Exercise-, and Assessor-Related Effects to Reliable and Unreliable Variance in Assessment Center Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 (1),  114-133. doi: 10.1037/a0030887
  • Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2013). Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations. Journal of Qual Quant, 47,  3277–3288. doi: 10.1007/s11135-012-9718-z
  • Simonenko, S.,Thornton, G. C., Gibbons, A. M., & Kravtcova, A. (2013). Personality Correlates of Assessment Center Consensus Competency Ratings. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 21 (4),   407-418. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12050
  • Simonenko, S., Thornton III, G.C., Gibbons, A.M., & Kravtcova, A. (2013). Personality Correlates of Assessment Center Consensus Competency Ratings: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27 (4),  407-419. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12050
  • Wirz, A., Melchers, K. G., Lievens, F., De Corte, W., & Kleinmann, M. (2013). Trade-Offs Between Assessor Team Size and Assessor Expertise in Affecting Rating Accuracy in Assessment Centers. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29, 13-20. doi:10.5093/tr2013a3
2012
  • Bernardin, H.J., Konopaske. R. & Hagan, C.M. (2012). A comparison of adverce impact levels based on top-down multisource and assessment center data: Promoting diversity and redicing legal challenges. Human Resource Management, 51 (3), pp.313-3412.
  • Jansen, A., Melchers, K.G., Lievens, F., Kleinman, M., Brandli, M. & Fraefel, M. (2012). Situation assessment as an ignored factor in behavioural consistancy paradigm underlying the validity of personnel selection process. Journal of Applied Psychology, doi: 10.103/a0031257.
  • Cahoon, M.V., Bowler, M.C. & Bowler, J.L. (2012). A reevaluation of assessment center construct-related validity. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(9), pp. 3-19.
  • Putka,D.J., Hoffman, B.J, (2012). Clarifying the contributions of asess-, dimension-, exercise-, and unreliable varience in assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, doi: 10.1037/a0030887
  • Hoffman, B.J. & Meade, A. (2012). Alternate approaches to understanding the psychometric properties of assessment centres: an analysis of the structure and equivalence of exercise ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(1), pp. 82-97.
2011
  • Becker, N., Hoft, S., Holtzenkkamp, M., & Spinath, F.M. (20011). The predictive validity of assessment centers in German speaking region: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personnel Psychology 10(2) pp.61-69.doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000031.
  • Hoffman, B.J., Melchers, K.G, Blair, C.A., Kleinmann, M & Ladd, R.T. (2011). Exercises and dimensions are the currency of assessment centres . Personnel Psychology, 64, pp. 351-395.
    Jansen, A., Lievens, F., Kleinmann, M. (2011). Do individual differences in perceiving situational demands moderate the relationship between personality and assessment centre dimension ratings? . Human Performance, 24(3), pp. 231-250
2010
  • Byham, W.C. (2010). Assessment centers are an excellent way of studying decision making. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 3(4), 443–444.
  • Jackson, D.J.R., Stillman, J.A. & Englert, P. (2010). Task-based assessment centres: empirical support for a systems model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), pp. 141-154.
  • Lievens, F. & Patterson, F. (2010). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advance level high-stakes selection. In Press: Journal of Applied Psychology, 1-49.
  • Petrides, K.V., Weinstein, Y., Chou, J., Furnham, A. & Swami, V. (2010). An investigation into assessment centre validity, fairness, and selection drivers . Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), pp. 227–235.


2006 - 2009

2009
  • Bowler, M. C., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). Assessment center construct-related validity: Stepping beyond the MTMM matrix. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 173-182.
  • Dilchert, S. & Ones, D.S. (2009). Assessment center dimensions: Individual differences correlate and meta-analytic incremental validity. Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3), 254-270.
  • Eurich, T.L., Krause, D.E., Cigularov, K. & Thornton, G.C. (2009). Assessment centers: current practices in the United States . Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, pp. 387-407.
  • Gibbons, A.M. & Rupp. D.E. (2009). Dimension consistency as an individual difference: a new (old) perspective on the assessment centre construct validity debate . Journal of Management, 35, pp. 1154-1181. doi: 10.1177/0149206308328504
  • International Task Force on Assessment Centre Guidelines. (2009). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment centre operations . International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(3), pp. 243-253.
  • Krause, D.E. & Thornton, G.C. (2009). A cross-cultural look at assessment center practices: survey results from Western Europe and North America . Applied Psychology, 58(4), pp. 557-585.
  • Lievens, F., Dilchart, S. & Ones, D.S. (2009). The importance of exercise and dimension factors in assessment centers: Simultaneous examination of construct-related and criterion-related validity. Human Performance, 22, 375-390.
  • Lievens, F. (2009). Assessment centres: a tale about dimensions, exercises, and dancing bears. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), pp. 102-121. doi.org/10.1080/13594320802058997
  • Lievens, F., Tett, R.P. & Schleicher, D.J. (2009). Assessment centers at the crossroads: toward a reconceptualization of assessment center exercises . Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 28, pp. 99-152.
  • Thornton, G.C.III, Wilson, C.L., Johnson, R.M. & Rogers, D.A. (2009). Managing Assessment Center Practices in the Context of Employment Discrimination Litigation.The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12, 175–186.
  • Thornton, G.C., & Krause, D.E. (2009). Selection versus development assessment centres: an international survey of design, execution, and evaluation . The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), pp. 478-498. doi: .org/10.1080/09585190802673536
  • Thornton, G.C., & Gibbons, A.M., Validity of assessment centers for personnel selection, Human Resource Management Review (2009), doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.02.2002.
  • Woo, S., Sims, C., Rupp, D., & Gibbons, A. M. (2009). Correction to “Development engagement within and following developmental assessment centers: Considering feedback favorability and self-assessor agreement.” Personnel Psychology, 62, 199-200.
2008
  • Arthur, W.A., Day, E.A. & Woehr, D.J. (2008). Mend it, don’t end it: An alternative view of assessment centre construct-related validity evidence. Industrial and Organisational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1(1), 105-111.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Villado, A.J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435-442.
  • Brannick, M.T. (2008). Back to basics of test construction and scoring . Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, pp.131-133.
  • Connely, B.S., Ones, D.S., Ramesh, A. & Goff, M. (2008). A pragmatic view of assessment center exercises and dimensions . Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, pp.121-124.
  • Dean, M. A., Roth, P. L., & Bobko, P. (2008). Ethnic and gender subgroup differences in assessment center ratings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 685-691.
  • Furnham, A., Jensen, T. & Crump, J. (2008). Personality, intelligence and assessment centre expert ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(4), pp. 356-366.
  • Furnham, A., Taylor, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2008). Personality and intelligence correlates of assessment center exercises. Individual Differences Research, 6(3), 181-192.
  • Howard, A. (2008). Making assessment centres work the way they are supposed to . Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, pp. 98-104.
  • Jones, R.G. & Born, M. (2008). Assessor constructs in use as the missing component in validation of assessment centre dimensions: a critique and directions for research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(3), pp. 229-239.
  • Jones, R.G. & Klimoski, R.J. (2008). Narrow standards for efficacy and the research playground: why either-or conclusions do not help. . Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, pp.137-139.
  • Jones, R.G., & Born, M.P. (2008). Assessor constructs in use as the missing component in validation of assessment center dimensions: A critique and directions for research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 229-238.
  • Lievens, F. (2008). What does exercise-based assessment really mean? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1,117-120.
  • Lance, C. E. (2008a). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 84-97. P 22
  • Lance, C.E. (2008b). Where have we been, how did we get there, and where shall we go? . Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, pp. 140-146.
  • Lievens, F. (2008). What does exercise-based assessment really mean?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, pp. 112–115.
  • Melchers, K.G. & König, C.J. (2008). It is not yet time to dismiss dimensions in assessment centers. . Industrial and Organisational Psychology: An Exchange on Science and Perspectives, 1, 125-127
  • Meriac, J.P., Hoffman, B.J., Woehr, D.J. & Fleisher, M.S. (2008). Evidence of the validity of assessment center dimensions: Analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1042-1052.
  • Moses, J. (2008). Assessment centers work, but for different reasons. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 1, 134-136.
  • Roth, P., Bobko, P., McFarland, L., & Buster, M. (2008). Work sample tests in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of black-white differences in overall and exercise scores. Personnel Psychology, 61, 637-662.
  • Rupp, D. E., Thornton III, G. C. & Gibbons, A. M. (2008). The construct validity of the assessment center method and usefulness of dimensions as focal constructs. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 116-120.
  • Schleicher, D.J., Day, D.V., Mayes, B.T. & Riggio, R.E. (2008). A new frame for frame-of-reference training Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 735-746.
  • Thornton, G.C. & Gibbons, A.M. (2008). Validity of Assessment Centers For Personnel Selection. In James Breaugh Special Issue on Personnel Selection. Human Resource Management Review. Editor, Rodger Griffith.
  • Woo, S. E., Sims, C. S., Rupp, D. E., & Gibbons, A. M. (2008). Development engagement within and following developmental assessment centers: Considering feedback favorability and self-assessor agreement. Personnel Psychology, 61, 727-759.
2007
  • Garavan, T.N. (2007). Using assessment centre performance to predict subjective person-organisation (P-O) fit: a longitudinal study of graduates . Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(2), pp. 150-167. doi 10.1108/02683940710726410
  • Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., & Robertson, I.T. (2007). The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 405-411.
  • Jackson, D. J. R., Barney, A.R., Stillman, J.A. & Kirkley, W. (2007). When traits are behaviours: the relationship between behavioural responses and trait-based overall assessment centre ratings . Human Performance, 20(4), pp, 415–432.
  • Jackson, D. J. R., Barney, A.R., Stillman, J.A. & Kirkley, W. (2007). When traits are behaviours: the relationship between behavioural responses and trait-based overall assessment centre ratings. Human Performance, 20(4), pp, 415–432.
  • König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G. M., & Klehe, U.-C. ( 2007). Candidates’ ability to identify criteria in nontransparent selection procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 283–292
  • Krajewski, H.T., Goffin, R.D., Rothstein, M.G. & Johnston, N.G. (2007). Is personality related to assessment center performance? That depends on how old you are . Journal of Business Psychology, 22(1), pp. 21-33.
  • Lance, C.E., Foster, M.R., Nemeth, Y.M., Gentry, W.A., & Drollinger, S. (2007). Extending the nomological network of assessment centre construct validity: prediction of cross-situationally consistent and specific aspects of assessment centre performance . Human Performance, 20(4), pp. 345–362.
  • Lance, C.E., Foster, M.R., Nemeth, Y.M., Gentry, W.A., & Drollinger, S. (2007). Extending the nomological network of assessment centre construct validity: prediction of cross-situationally consistent and specific aspects of assessment centre performance . Human Performance, 20(4), pp. 345–362.
  • Lance, C. E., Woehr, D. J., & Meade, A. W. (2007). Case study: A Monte Carlo investigation of assessment center construct validity models. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 430-448.
  • Love, K.G. & DeArmond, M.S. (2007). The validity of assessment centre ratings and 16PF Personality trait scores in police sergeant promotions: A case of Incremental Validity, Public Personnel Management, 36 (1), 21-32.
  • Sagie, A. & Magnezy, R. (2007). Assessor type, number of distinguishable dimension categories, and assessment centre construct validity Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (1997), 70, 103-108.
2006
  • Abraham, J. D., Morrison, J. D., Jr., & Burnett, D. D. (2006). Feedback seeking among developmental assessment center participants. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 383-394.
  • Anderson, N., Lievens, F., Van Dam, K., & Born, M. (2006). A construct investigation of gender differences in a leadership role assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 555-566.
  • Bowler, M.C., & Woehr, D.J. (2006). A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1114–1124.
  • Krause, D. E., Kersting, M., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton, G. C., III. (2006). Incremental validity of assessment center ratings over cognitive ability tests: A study at the executive management level. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 360-371.
  • Lievens, F., Chasteen, C.S., Day, E.A., & Christiansen, N.D. (2006). Large-scale investigation of the role of trait activation theory for understanding assessment center convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 247-258.
  • Rupp, D. E., Gibbons, A. M., Baldwin, A. M., Snyder, L. A., Spain, S. M., Woo, S. E., Brummel, B. J., Sims, C. S., & Kim, M. (2006). An initial validation of developmental assessment centers as accurate assessments and effective training interventions. Psychologist-Manager Journal, 9, 171-200.
  • Rupp, D. E., Snyder, L. A., Gibbons, A. M., & Thornton, G. C., III. (2006). What should developmental assessment centers be developing? Psychologist-Manager Journal, 9, 75-98.


2002 - 2005

2005
  • Jackson, D.J.R., Atkins, S.G., Fletcher, R.B., & Stillman, J.A. (2005) Frame of reference training for assessment centers: effects on interrater reliability when rating behaviours and ability traits. Public Personnel Management, 22 March, pages?.
  • Jackson, D.J.R., Atkins, S.G. & Stillman, J.A. (2005). Rating tasks versus dimensions in assessment centers: A psychometric comparison. Human Performance, 18(3), 213-241.
  • Lievens, F. & Thornton, C.G. (2005). Assessment Centers: Recent developments in practice and research. Handbook of Selection (pp.243-264). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Stillman, J.A. & Jackson, D.J.R. (2005). A detection theory approach to the evaluation of assessors in assessment centers. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 78, 581-594.
  • Thornton, G. C. III., & Rupp, D. E. (2005). Assessment centers in human resource management: Strategies for prediction, diagnosis, and development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
2004
  • Lance, C.E., Foster, M.R., Gentry, W.A., & Thoresen, J.D. (2004). Assessor cognitive processes in an operational assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 22-35.
  • Lance, C. E., Foster, M. R., Gentry, W. A., & Thoresen, J. D. (2004a). Assessor cognitive processes in an operational assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 22–35.
  • Lance, C. E., Lambert, T., Gewin, A., Lievens, F., & Conway, J., (2004b). Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center post exercise dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 377-385.
2003
  • Arthur, W. Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). Distinguishing between methods and constructs: The criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56 (5), 125-154.
  • Caldwell, C., Thornton, G. C., & Gruys, M. (2003). Ten classic assessment center errors: Challenges to selection validity. Public Personnel Management, 32, 73-88.
  • Collins, J.M., Schmidt, F.L., Sanchez-Ku, M., Thomas, L., McDaniel, M.A., & Lee, H. (2003). Can basic individual differences shed light on the construct meaning of assessment center evaluations? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 17-29.
  • Damitz, M., Manzey, D., Kleinmann, M., & Severin, K. (2003). Assessment center for pilot selection: construct and criterion validity and the impact of assessor type. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(2), 193-212.
  • Greyling, L., Visser, D., & Fourie, L. (2003). Construct validity of competency dimensions in a team leader assessment centre. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(2), 10-19.
  • Kolk, N.J., Born, M.Ph., & Van der Flier, H. (2003). The transparent assessment centre: the effects of revealing dimensions to candidates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(4), 648-668.
  • Lievens, F., Harris, M.M., Van Keer, E., & Bisqueret, C. (2003). Predicting cross-cultural training performance: The validity of personality, cognitive ability, and dimensions measured by an assessment center and a behavior description interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 476-489.
  • Thornton, G.C.III, & Rupp, D.R. (2003). Simulations and assessment centers. In J.Thomas (Ed.), Industrial and organisational assessment (pp.319-344). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Woehr, D. J., & Arthur, W. Jr. (2003). The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors. Journal of Management, 29, 231-258.
2002
  • Atkins, P.W.B., & Wood, R.E. (2002). Self- versus others’ ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55, 871-904.
  • Dayan, K., Kasten, R. & Fox, S. (2002). Entry-Level Police Candidates Assessment Center: An Efficient Tool or a Hammer to Kill a Fly? Personnel Psychology, 55, 827-849.
  • Haaland, S., & Christiansen, N.D. (2002). Implications of trait-activation theory for evaluating the construct validity of assessment center ratings. Personnel Psychology, 55, 137-163.
  • Kolk, N.J., Born, M.Ph., Van Der Flier, H., & Olman, J.M. (2002). Assessment center procedures: cognitive load during the observation phase. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(4), 271-277.
  • Kolk, N. J., Born, M. P., & van der Flier, H. (2002). Impact of common rater variance on construct validity of assessment center dimension judgments. Human Performance, 15, 325-337
  • Kurz, R., & Bartram, D. (2002). Competency and individual performance: Modeling the world of work. In I. T. Robertson, M. Callinan, & D. Bartram (Eds.), Organisational effectiveness: The role of psychology. pp. 227–255. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Lievens, F. (2002). Trying to understand the different pieces of the construct validity puzzle of assessment centers: An examination of assessor and assessee effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 675–686.
  • Schleicher, D.J., Day, D.V., Mayes, B.T., & Riggio, R.E. (2002). A new frame for frame-of-reference training: enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 735-746.


1997 - 2001

2001
  • Hoeft, S. & Schuler, H. (2001). The conceptual basis of assessment centre ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 114-123.
  • Jansen, P.G.W. & Stoop, B.M.A. (2001). The dynamics of assessment center validity: Results of a 7-year study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 741-753.
  • Lievens, F. (2001). Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, inter-rater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 255-264.
  • Lievens, F. & Conway, J.M. (2001). Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: a large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1202–1222.
  • Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., & Van Dam, K. (2001). Assessors’ use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: a five-factor model perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 74, 623-636.
  • Lievens, F. (2001). Assessors and use of assessment centre dimensions: a fresh look at a troubling issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 203-221.
  • Lievens, F., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Understanding the assessment centre process: Where are we now? International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 16, 246–286.
  • Lievens, F. (2001). Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 255-264.
  • Sackett, P.R., & Tuzinski, K.A. (2001). The role of dimensions and exercises in assessment center judgments. In M. London (Ed.). How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 111-129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2000
  • Arthur, W.A., Woehr, D.J. & Maldegen, R. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical re-examination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26(4), 813-835.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Woehr, D. J., & Maldegen, R. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26, 813-835.
  • International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2000). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management, 29, 315-331.
  • Lance, C. E., Newbolt, W. H., Gatewood, R. D., Foster, M. R., French, N. R., & Smith, D. E. (2000). Assessment center exercise factors represent cross situational specificity, not method bias. Human Performance, 13, 323-353.
  • Robie, C., Osburn, H.G., Morris, M.A., Etchegaray, J.M. & Adams, K.A. (2000). Effects of the rating process on the construct validity of assessment center dimension evaluations. Human Performance, 13(4), 355-370.
  • Spector, P.E., Schneider, J.R., Vance, C.A. & Hezlett, S.A. (2000). The relation of cognitive ability and personality traits to assessment centre performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 30(7), 1474-1491.
  • Tett, R.P., & Guterman, H.A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, pp. 397–423.
1999
  • Lamsdale, C., Wood, R., & Mulrooney, C. (1999). An alternative to an assessment centre on six pieces of paper? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(3), 170-176.
  • Lievens, F., & Goemaere, H. (1999). A different look at assessment centers: views of assessment center users. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(4), 215-219.
  • Moser, C., Schuler, H., & FUnke, U. (1999). The moderating effect of raters’ opportunities to observe ratees’ job performance on the validity of an assessment centre. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(3), 133-140.
1998
  • Appelbaum, S.H., Harel, V. & Shapiro, B. (1998). The developmental assessment centre: the next generation. Career Development International, 3(1), 5-12.
  • Goldstein, H.W., Yusko, K.P., Braverman, E.P., Smith, D. & Chung, B. (1998). The role of cognitive ability in the subgroup differences and incremental validity of assessment center exercises. Personnel Psychology, 51, 357-374.
  • Hennessy, J., Mabey, B., & Warr, P. (1998). Assessment centre observation procedures: an experimental comparison of traditional, checklist and coding methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(4), 222-231.
  • Lievens, F. (1998). Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: a review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(3), July, pp 141-152.
  • Schleicher, D.J., & Day, D.V. (1998). A cognitive evaluation of frame-of-reference training: Content and process issues. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 73, 76-101.
  • Schmidt, F.L. & Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
  • Tillema, H. (1998). Assessment of potential, from assessment centres to development centres. International Journal of Selecion and Assessment, 6(3), 185-191.
1997
  • Ahmed, Y., Payne, T. & Whiddett, S. (1997). A process for assessment exercise design: a model of best practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), 62-68.
  • Ahmed, Y., Payne, T. & Whiddett, S. (1997). A process for assessment exercise design: a model of best practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), 62-68.
  • Donahue, L. M., Truxillo, D. M., Cornwell, J. M.,&Gerrity, M. J. (1997). Assessment center construct validity and behavioral checklists: Some additional findings. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 85–108.
  • Howard, A. (1997).  A reassessment of assessment centers: Challenges for the 21st century. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 12(5), 13-52.
  • Kudisch, J. D., Ladd, R. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). New evidence on the construct validity of diagnostic assessment centers: The Findings may not be so troubling after all. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 129–144.
  • Lowry, P.E. (1997). The assessment center process: New directions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 53-62.
  • Sagie, A., & Magnezy, R. (1997). Assessor type, number of distinguishable dimension categories, and assessment centre construct validity. Journal of Occupational and rganizational Psychology, 70, 103–108.
  • Thornton, G.C. III, Tziner, A., Dahan, M., Clevenger, J.P., & Meir, E. (1997). Construct validity of assessment centre judgements: analyses of the behavioural reporting methods, Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 12, 109-128.


1993 - 1996

1996
  • Baron, H. & Janman, K. (1996). Fairness in the assessment center. International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 11, 61-114.
  • Chan, D. (1996). Criterion and construct validation of an assessment centre. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 69, 167–181.
  • Fleenor, J. W. (1996). Constructs and developmental assessment centers: Further troubling empirical findings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 319–333.
  • Goffin, R. D., Rothstein, M. G., & Johnston, N. G. (1996). Personality testing and the assessment center: Incremental validity for managerial selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 746-756.
  • Kleinmann, M., Kuptsch, C., & Köller, O. (1996). Transparency: A necessary requirement for the construct-related validity of assessment centres. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 67-84.
  • Lowry, P. E. (1996). A survey of the assessment center process in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 25(3), 307-321.
1995
  • Day, D.V., & Sulsky, L.M. (1995). Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 158-167.
  • Bray, D.W. (1995). Centered on assessment (a retrospective review of Assessment of Men). Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 468-471.
  • Engelbrecht, A. S., & Fischer, A. H. (1995). The managerial performance implications of a developmental assessment center process. Human Relations, 48, 387-404.
  • Jones, R. G., & Whitmore, M. D. (1995a). Evaluating developmental assessment centers as interventions. Personnel Psychology, 48, 377-388.
  • Jones, R. G., & Whitmore, M. D. (1995b). “Evaluating developmental assessment centers as interventions”: Errata. Personnel Psychology, 48, 562-562.
1994
  • Kriek, H.J., Hurst D.N. and Charoux, J.A.E. (1994). The assessment centre: Testing the fairness hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 20(2), 21–5.
  • Macan, T.H., Avedon, M.J., Paese, M. & Smith, D.E. (1994). The effects of applicants’ reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center. Personnel Psychology, 47(4), 715-738.
  • Motowidlo, S.J. & Van Scotter, J.R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
  • Ritchie, R.J. (1994). Using the assessment centre method to predict managerial potential. Consulting Psychology Journal, 46(1), 16-23.
  • Woehr, D.J. (1994). Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 525-534.
1993
  • Arneson, S., Millikin-Davies, M., & Hogan, J. (1993). Validation of personality and cognitive measures for insurance claims examiners. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7(4), 459-473.
  • Blaney, D. R., Hobson, C.J., Meade, M. E., Scodro, J (1993). The assessment center: Evaluating managerial potential. Nursing Management, 24(2), 54-57.
  • Harris, M. M., Becker, A. S., & Smith, D. E. (1993). Does the assessment center scoring method affect the cross-situational consistency of ratings? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 675-678.
  • Highhouse, S., & Harris, M.M. (1993). The measurement of assessment center situations: Bem’s template matching technique for examining exercise similarity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), 140-155.
  • Kleinmann, M. (1993). Are rating dimensions in assessment centers transparent for participants? Consequences for criterion and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 988-993.


1989 - 1992

1992
  • Iles, P. (1992). Centres of Excellence? Assessment and development centres, managerial competencies and human resource strategies. British Journal of Management, 3(2), 79-90.
  • Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitraitmultimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin,112, 165-172.
  • Schneider, J. R., & Schmitt, N. (1992). An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimension and exercise constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 32-41.
1990
  • Bagozzi, R.P. & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 547-560.
  • Reilly, R. R., Henry, S., & Smither, J. W. (1990). An examination of the effects of using behavior checklists on the construct validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 43, 71–84.
  • Shore, T. H., Thornton, G. C., & Shore, L. M. (1990). Construct validity of two categories of assessment center dimension ratings. Personnel Psychology, 43, 101-116.
  • Thornton, C.G. & Cleveland, J.N. (1990). Developing managerial talent through simulation. American Psychologist, 45(2), 190-199.
1989
  • Appelbaum, S.H., Kay, F. & Shapiro, B.T. (1989). The assessment centre is not dead! How to keep it alive and well. The Journal of Management Development, 8(5), 51-65.
  • Gaugler, B.B., & Thornton, G.C., III (1989). Number of assessment center dimensions as a determinant of assessor accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 611-618.
  • McEvoy, G.M., & Beatty, R.W. (1989). Assessment centers and subordinate appraisals of managers: a seven-year examination of predictive validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 37-52.


1985 - 1988

1987
  • Fiske, D.W. (1987). Construct invalidity comes from method effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 285-307.
  • Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493-511.
  • Klimoski, R. & Brickner, M. (1987). Why do assessment centers work: the puzzle of assessment center validity. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 243-260.
  • Robertson, I., Gratton, L., & Sharpley, D. (1987). The psychometric properties and design of managerial assessment centres: Dimensions into exercises won’t go. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60(3), 262-274.


1981 - 1984

1984
  • Neidig, R.D., & Neidig, P.J. (1984). Multiple assessment center exercises and job relatedness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 182-186
  • Sackett, P.R., & Dreher, G.F. (1984). Situation specificity of behavior and assessment center validation strategies: a rejoinder to Neidig and Neidig. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 187–190.
  • Schmitt, N., Gooding, R.Z., Noe, R.A. & Kirsch, M. (1984). Meta analysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 27(3), 407-422.
  • Turnage, J.J. & Muchinsky, P.M (1984). A comparison of the predictive validity of assessment centre evaluations versus traditional measures in forecasting supervisory job performance: Interpretative implications of criterion distortion for assessment paradigm. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 595-602.
1983
  • Edwards, M.R. (1983). OJQ Offers alternative to assessment centre. Public Personnel Management Journal, 12(2), 146-155.
1982
  • Sackett, P.R. & Dreher, G.F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(4), 401-410.
  • Thornton, C.G. & Byham, W.C. (1982). Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.
  • Tziner, A. & Dolan, S. (1982). Validity of an assessment center for identifying future female officers in the military. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 728-736.
1981
  • Dreher, G.F., & Sackett, P.R. (1981). Some problems with applying content validity evidence to assessment center procedures. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 551–560.
  • Nichols, L.C. & Hudson, J. (1981). Dual role assessment center: selection and development. Personnel Psychology, 60(5), 380-386.


1966 - 1980

1977
  • Klimoski, R. & Strickland, W.J. (1977). Assessment Centers: Valid or merely prescient. Personnel Psychology, 30(3), 353-363.
  • Moses, J. (1977). The assessment center method. In J.L.Moses & W.C.Byham (Eds.) Applying the assessment center method. (pp.3-11). New York: Pergamon.
  • Schmitt, N. (1977). Interrater agreement in dimensionality and combination of assessment center judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 171-176.
1974
  • Bray, D. W., Campbell, R. J., & Grant, D. L. (1974). Formative years in business: A long-term AT&T study of managerial lives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
1973
  • Moses, J. (1973). The development of an assessment center for the early identification of supervisory potential. Personnel Psychology, 26(4), 569-580.
1968
  • Bray, D.W., & Campbell, R.J. (1968). Selection of salesmen by means of an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(1), 36-41.
1966
  • Bray, D. W., & Grant, D. L. (1966). The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 80, 1-27.
  • Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.